The Satellite Hoax PART 5: Satellite Crashes ARE NOT WHAT YOU THINK

If you missed Part 1, be sure to start there.  Click here to go back to Part 1.

WHERE GOOGLE EARTH ACTUALLY CAME FROM

Ok, remember how in Part 1 we discussed the U-2 and A-12 spy planes, the CIA memos, such as “Satellites Uprisings” (over a YEAR before a satellite ever came to be), then we talked about the government faking alien shit with The Roswell Hoax, meanwhile, our buddy Ray Stanford was pumping UFO content in the media? Well, if all of this hasn’t seemed a little suspicious so far, guess who Google bought Earth Viewer from? 

 

Mmmhmm… the CIA… the fucking CIA, with their fucking Lockheed Martin high-altitude U-2 planes, A-12 planes and cartoon satellites, is where Google got Earth Viewer from… are the pieces of the puzzle starting to fit together? Kinda? Great! Let’s continue on…

SATELLITES CRASHING DOWN

Why is it that this never comes crashing down to earth?:

This never went careening through someone’s roof:

This thing didn’t collapse the World Trade Center:

Imagine if this came speeding down and harpooned a group of people waiting in line at a food truck:

It’s like the modern-day version of the 1980s cartoon Transformers.  Autobots, roll out! 

Nope, these never come crashing down to earth:

But these do: 

 

Yeah, it’s a satellite, attached to a balloon:

More satellites falling from the sky, attached to balloons: 

 

That dude was almost murdered by a satellite attached to a balloon (imagine what that obituary would say):

And there it is, a busted satellite, its raggedy balloon and two dudes that have no clue what to do next:

Even more satellite-balloons crashing down: 

 

The cartoon footage from the news broadcast shows the satellite in space as this fancy, orbiting thingamabob:

But the real footage, from the exact same video showed it is yet another satellite on yet another balloon:

Yes, what comes crashing down to earth is balloons with what we are told are space satellites attached to them.

They tried to hide the balloon when Samsung’s satellite fell to the ground.

Here’s a better photo. You can see the harness got stuck in a tree:

On the upside, if a satellite falls on your house, the United Nations established a law that will protect you financially:

THE SPACE ROCKETS

 Folks, the dates of the rocket launches (the rockets that are bringing satellites to outer space) line up with BALLOON LAUNCHES!… It’s all trickery and cartoons…

THE SATELLITE HOAX?

Thus far, we have learned that outer space satellites seem to not have any purpose, which begs the question, “Is it even possible to have a satellite in outer space?”

 It took me quite a while to separate my mind from over 30 years of outer space brainwashing and look at the big picture without any assumptions.  It was difficult for me to accept that what we are being told could be nothing more than a PSYOP.   But, when I finally reached the point where I could detach from the decades of propaganda and actually look at the evidence, I discovered none of it made a damn bit of sense.  And before we get into this, if you are reading this and thinking I am insane for even suggesting it could be a lie, I totally understand.  I thought the same about Conspiracy Rob.  

Here’s a couple things that got me to start questioning satellites:

The problem I have with satellites and space as a whole is, not only that we can’t see any real photos or videos, and not only that Freemason-NASA has been caught providing fake content but pretending it is real, and not only that what they are telling us does not match what they are showing us, but my issue is that it requires us to suspend all logic to believe something there is little-to-no real evidence of.  Let me give you some basic examples:

THE COMPONENTS OF A SATELLITE

Here are the parts of a Satellite, according to NASA’s school curriculum for grades K-12:

The first option for powering the satellite is a battery.  Generally speaking, Lithium batteries cannot be charged in 0F or colder and can burst into flames when the temp exceeds 220F (read EV vehicle news and you’ll see how unstable these things are, and that’s here on earth, in earth-sun-temps.)

But, NASA tells us the atmosphere, where the satellites are (Thermosphere and Exosphere), range in temp from -122F (-86C) to +2192F (+1200C).  However, the Thermosphere can also reach +3600 °F (+2,000 °C), or more!

You don’t have to be good at math to tell that these temps are outside the range of battery tolerance.  

Then there’s the solar panels, which still require a battery to power the satellite because the solar panels power the battery.  Here are the components of solar panels, which, as you can see, do have a high melting point.  Glass is the highest, and can tolerate almost 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit (1,648C). 

But, according to Wikipedia, the Thermosphere reaches 6,000 degrees C, which is 10,832 F. 

Even if we ignore what Wiki said about the temp, NASA recently changed the temperature of the Thermosphere to “up to 4,500F”  (+2482C), which is still nearly double what glass can handle:

No matter which temp it is, it far exceeds the melting point of solar panels and the temp batteries can be used at.  Here’s where you must suspend all logic to understand it:

NASA explains this by saying the density of the air makes it so the heat, 4530+F, cannot be felt, in fact it will feel cold.   This image is from NASA.gov:

Again, we are required to suspend all logic because there is no other situation in life in which the temperature is so boiling hot that it actually feels cold.

Then there’s the issue with Space Radiation, which is a huge health risk for astronauts:

Now imagine a battery in a microwave, getting radiated and heated (a microwave only gets up to around 300F max, space is “up to 4,500F” (+2482C)). Here’s a dude who put little, tiny batteries in a microwave, not big EV / Solar Panel / Satellite batteries: (54 second video)

“But what about the Hubble Telescope?! That thing sends us so many photos! According to NASA the Hubble Space Telescope is powered by two 25-foot solar panels that convert the Sun's energy into electricity!”.

Well, for starters, we are supposed to believe these are real photos, right?:

Let’s pretend these are all real, authentic photographs. If that is the case, where is the sun?

Is this the sun that is powering two 25-foot solar panels?

Based on my personal experience (nightmare) with a 3-foot solar panel, ambient light is not enough to power a panel because it requires multiple hours of direct sun. As you can see from the image above, the sun is not bright enough to light up space, it does not even provide ambient light, therefore it would not be bright enough to power a panel that is located within the darkness.

Additionally, this guy did math and noticed some inconsistencies regarding the Hubble, so he gave NASA a call. Here is the amazing 37-minute phone call (yes, 37 minutes, but you truly need to hear it!). Below I have provided the call as an audio-only file so you can listen while you do other stuff and well as a video, if you want to instead watch it. Skip this for now because I have some really interesting stuff to show you below, but def come back and listen to it when you finish this article:

And again, whether it is outer space satellites or The Hubble, nothing ever gets in the way of the photography. In Part 1 we discussed how airplanes are never in satellite photos. They want us to believe this art satellite…

…is up there taking this photo:

But there are 0 planes.

Here’s Tampa Bay Florida, 0 planes, but you can see a couple boats (I think those are boats? On the right?):

But it’s not just the temperature we have to accept as being truth because NASA says so, it’s the entire topic: We are on a spinning ball, that is spinning faster than a Mach 1 airplane! Seriously, they claim the earth is spinning at around 1,000 miles per hour. Here is a baseball launched at 1,000 mph:

Despite the earth spinning that fast, while orbiting the sun at 66,600mph, on a 66.6 degree axis, we cannot feel it, water stays level in oceans, you can toss a football to your buddy and it doesn’t get ripped away by the spin, nobody is getting motion sickness from taking their dog for a walk on a Friday afternoon… like I said, you have to suspend all common sense, all logic, you have to suspend everything you know to be true to believe this. And all along, there is no actual evidence of it. Not only must we relieve ourselves of all logic to believe the story, but we are shown literal art as proof. Is that ok with you? $25+ BILLION in tax dollars per year and we get art?! It’s not alright with me. There is no other business in the world who could provide literally nothing other than computer illustrations and be paid this much for this long, with 0 recourse for the buyer. (unless the business is a CGI company, then providing nothing but CGI would be ok, but NASA isn’t supposed to be a graphic arts business. They are being paid handsomely to go to outer space and operate these cartoon satellites.)

Think about this, my friends; let’s say we buy a really f*cking expensive house. It was so expensive that we had to sell the majority of our organs to afford it. 35 years later, the home builder is assuring us that they’re still building the home and it will be done soon, so we’re still living in your parents basement. Although we really miss our kidneys and can’t afford a pack of toothpicks, at least we have a picture of the house they are building for us…

Then, when we’re like, “Hey, we would really like to see another picture of the house because it’s been a long time and it was really expensive…”, they say, “Sure!” and give us this:

…then they ask for another million dollars:

NEXT READ:  SATELLITES: THE NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF THE WHOLE DAMN LIE  (Part 6)