The Mind-Blowing 1917 Cancer Journal - Tumors and More [Cancer Part 2 by Agent131711]

Please read Part 1 first, because in it I lay out a timeline (1850-1950) showing how cancer became an industry, and you won't truly respect today's findings without first examining the timeline (CLICK HERE FOR PART 1). 

Because I have weird hobbies, I was reading through old medical journals and books regarding cancer, but had I not had weird hobbies, then I would not be able to share some really fascinating information that I found in said journals.  

Let’s begin with a 1917 publication from the Journal of Cancer Research and a newspaper report.

The book begins by explaining that cancer in wild animals was exceptionally rare, but they were finding some cases.  The interesting part is that the animals that had cancer were considered to be “wild.”  The problem is that these so-called wild animals weren't. These creatures were captive at the Philadelphia Zoo.  In the zoo animals, they found cancer in four birds, three wolves, one mouse, one goat, and one zebra.  Of course, there was no consideration for how these animals were kept, how large their confinement areas were and if they had room to run and play, what kind of food they were being fed, or how often their water was changed.  Additionally, there was no investigation into why so many zoo animals had tumors, and instead the investigation was into the mysterious lumps themselves. 

A scientist named Haaland set about to study lumps.  This guy had a ton of mice in his laboratory—and I do mean a ton; twelve thousand to be exact!  

Now, you have to understand that lab animals are treated horrifically.  Whether they are mice, guinea pigs, cats, dogs, monkeys, or what have you, they are locked in cages that are far too small, fed a cheap, low-quality diet, terrorized by humans, and they typically don’t even have toys or bedding because these cost money and take time to clean. Therefore, these creatures walk in circles on metal grates, which rub their feet raw and cause bleeding.  It is so common for these animals to become ill and even die from stress, loneliness, boredom, depression, or insanity from confinement, that in numerous experiments I have read, the scientists didn’t know whether the animals died from the “virus” they injected into their eyes or testicles or whether they died from what the lab men refer to as “external factors,” meaning a shitty existence and torture.  

That said, this dude shockingly had 12,000 mice to run experiments on. One was a 25-month-old female who had a massive lump (tumor) that had penetrated through her skull and was growing into a vein.  Haaland cut out the tumor, liquefied it, mixed it with chemicals, then injected it into eleven more mice. He found another mouse, this one with a tumor the size of a walnut, liquefied it, mixed it with god-knows-what, and injected it into 800 more mice. Apparently a little tumor goes a long way.  

Sometimes he would gather six tumors, liquefy them together, and inject them into over a thousand little critters.  The process kept repeating because there were a lot of mice to jab filth into. It should be noted that an unknown number of these mice were suffering from preexisting injuries and had bone damage from the injuries. We do not know if these injuries were caused by the scientist, other mice, or inadequate cage space / improper cage setup.  Regardless of the reason, the preexisting injuries were seen as irrelevant for these experiments, but any commonsensical person would think that if you are studying a mysterious health condition, you would want to consider preexisting conditions. 

Now here’s why I am telling you this: As I mentioned previously, it is my belief, as well as the belief of a great many of my peers, that a tumor is our body wadding up toxins. This means Haaland was removing a ball of toxins from one mouse, liquifying it, blending it with chemicals, and then injecting the load of toxins into other mice, many of whom were already suffering from serious injuries.  Well, after the injection of filth, most of those mice also developed a lump—which makes sense because their little bodies needed to wad up those toxins too.  

Haaland must have been a big deal back then because there was also an article in the newspaper about him. You see, the medicine men couldn’t figure out what caused cancer, and because everyone refused to look at diet and living conditions, they had to resort to making cancer.  You’re thinking to yourself, “How does one make such a thing?”  Let me tell you.  The first efforts involved contagion theory, in which one cancerous rat (meaning a rat with a lump) would give it to another, but these experiments all failed. But as you know, the medical science industry is creative, and the men in white coats will not accept defeat, so they eventually discovered the solution was cockroaches and rats. Yes, cockroaches and rats. Long story short, Haaland tortured enough creatures to solidify a process that would produce a lump in a rat. This lump was then deemed to be the same as what the industry called “cancer” in humans. The process to make a cancer lump in a critter was as follows: 

Step 1: Make a rat deathly ill. It has to be so sick that it has parasites. 

Step 2: Feed its excrement, parasites and all, to a cockroach. 

Step 3: When the parasites are in the roach, they should lay eggs.  

Step 4: The roach is then fed to rats. 

The rats then develop swellings, which are called cancer. These lumps are then studied to save humans. 

It’s dumbfounding that these scientists, although running experiments that are anti-scientific because they have no control and no consistency, repeatedly prove that cancer is caused by an external source, specifically pollution put into the body, yet the men in lab coats are so blinded by preconceived notions that they cannot see the obvious. 

Before the end of the study, all 12,000 mice were dying, so the scientists killed them all and performed autopsies.  Because this study was completely unscientific, there wasn’t much to learn from it aside from the fact that what science calls “tumors” and I call “lumps” can be created in a species by injecting them with filth. An observation of interest was that the cancers forming in mice happened to form in the identical areas on the mice as they do on humans, including the testicles and ovaries.  

The most interesting observation, which the scientist did not seem to think was all that interesting, but I find it to be, was that many of the mice had “sarcomas,” meaning lumps or swelling that appear suddenly or grow rapidly in weeks or months. When these mice were autopsied, it was discovered that the mice with sarcomas also had one or more tumors.  Clearly something or some things were toxifying the tiny bodies of these mice to the point that they were creating numerous lumps and quickly, yet no external sources were ever considered.   

The next publication we are going to discuss comes to us from the 1950s.  This one is from the California Cancer Commission Studies.  

It’s more of a guide for medical professionals than actual studies, but I found some of the information within to be worth sharing, specifically the section on childhood cancer.  Here, it outlines that, by the 1950s, childhood cancer was no longer rare!  Yes, folks, all the way back in the 1950s, even children were developing abnormal lumps.  

As discussed previously, the medical-science industry never looked at the causation of the lumps, but they will notice correlations, and they will call the correlation a precursor to cancer, just as chronic mouth inflammation was a correlation, but no doctor or researcher bothered to ask what people are consuming that is causing their mouth to burn and swell.  Science looks at coexisting conditions in the same weird manner. They see the coexisting condition as a symptom of the lump as opposed to a symptom of the same cause as the lump. It would be like seeing someone wearing an arm cast with a giant bruise on their chest and then, instead of asking if they were in a car accident, assuming the bruise caused the broken bone. It's quite bizarre, to be honest. 

That in mind, according to the publication, science found that childhood brain cancer is associated with a calcified pineal gland. That makes a ton of sense, doesn't it?  This happens when tiny bits of calcium and phosphorus build up and harden inside the pineal gland, a small pea-shaped part of the brain.  So the child’s pineal is corroded, and the body jumps in to assist. It wads up the waste and forms a cyst or tumor.  We then call it brain cancer and begin performing morbid treatments to destroy the lump. 

Further, the publication outlines that the earliest symptoms of brain tumors are vomiting, digestive disturbances, headache, and being uncoordinated or imbalanced—all signs of toxicity.  

When it comes to childhood stomach cancer cases, these lumps are accompanied by stomach ulcers (crater-like sores) and / or lesions. Lesions are damage or abnormal changes in the tissue of an organism, usually caused by injury or disease.  So these children who have lumps also have so much toxification in their stomachs that they have developed huge sores and / or tissue damage!  Yet nobody stops to ask what they are being fed or drinking.  

Childhood bone cancer is another point of note.  Here, the medicine men say the first symptom of the disease is intermittent pain, which gets worse at night.  This pain is typically in one area of the body.  As the disease progresses, the pain becomes worse and worse until it dominates the individual’s life.  In my opinion, this sounds like a chemical that attacks bones and tissue, which would be “vitamin D,” or similar compounds that are fat-soluble, meaning our bodies cannot flush them out, so they compile and compile. These compounds attack and soften bones, tissue, tendons, and organs, which is why they are pumped into cattle before slaughter. [Read my story of how I became an advocate against supplements after being injured by vitamin D.]  

So, as the child’s body continues to take in more and more of these substances each day, the pain progresses. And what time of day does the child suffer from the worst pain?  After dinner. I would guess that this child eats a lot of “fortified” processed food, which is a witch’s brew of untested chemical combinations that science calls “supplements.” [See the list of resources at the bottom of this publication.]

Next up is childhood kidney cancer, which was beginning to attack infants!  Because of this, the medicine men were encouraged to perform diagnostic checks in baby clinics and also to be performed by infant physicians during their checkups.  These infected infants had masses of tumors!  As I see it, there are few ways a child this young could become so poisoned that it has a lump.  Those ways would be the mother’s diet and / or supplementation or the infant’s formula, which is fortified and made from ingredients like soy, dyes, and corn syrup.  

Leukemia, they say, usually begins with the flu.  What is the flu?  It is my belief that it is a large-scale poisoning; specifically, it's our bodies going into overdrive to flush out the toxins by any means possible. That is why we sweat, shiver, vomit, cough, have diarrhea, and even have a runny or stuffy nose.  Our bodies recognize that this is a level 10 threat, and there is no time to wait. And if you're not sure if that is what is going on, simply compare the symptoms of the flu to those of poisoning. 

Of course, you could have the same reaction from eating contaminated food or drinking toxic water. Regardless, it is large-scale poisoning.  

Anyway, leukemia typically begins with the flu.  Now we must ask, what is leukemia?  According to science, it's an umbrella term for blood cancer. They say these cancers start with problems with the creation of blood cells.  It's intriguing knowing that this health affliction begins after a child suffers a large-scale poisoning, right? 

Now for a few interesting finds in this book regarding cancer of all ages, meaning not specifically limited to children. 

•  The medical-science industry advises that a lump on the face, nose, lips, in the mouth, or tonsils is often the first sign. 

• When giving women pelvic exams to check for cancer, doctors were cautioned to look for vaginal deterioration or erosion or vaginal skin easily bleeding.  Folks, if someone's private is eroding or easily bleeding, this individual is suffering from serious harm. This is harm that didn't happen overnight. It took a very long time to show itself. I'm not sure what someone would have to do to themselves to physically fall apart to that degree. It sounds like they are literally rotting away. It's incredibly sad, isn't it? 

• A common precursor for what doctors called lymphoblastomata cancer was hugely swollen lymph nodes. They were swollen so large that you can visually see the swelling, but the swelling doesn't hurt the individual.  The swelling can be so severe that doctors have referred to it as “expansive growth.”  What is swelling? It’s inflammation. It’s a reaction. So this “expansive swelling,” which is a reaction, so commonly occurs before a cancer lump forms that it too is considered a precursor. 

• Another common sign is “unexplained fever.”  The fever is always unexplained because the medicine men refuse to ask a patient to itemize their diet. I’ve told you this story before, but I’ll tell you again; my coworkers stop to get fast food and a pop or an energy drink every morning before work.  By lunch they are coughing or have sinus issues. “Allergies” are blamed, which justifies popping allergy pills. The pills suppress the symptoms, which “proves” this mysterious thing called “allergies” (which apparently floats around in our office daily right before noon) is the culprit.  I bet you $10 if they swapped out their fast food and soda for a banana and a tea, there would be no need for the pills, but what do I know? I’m not a doctor who gets sent to the Bahamas annually compliments of the allergy pill company as a thank you for all the prescriptions he writes.  Moving along.

• Another symptom of cancer is severe bleeding caused by minor injuries or tooth extraction.  Again, the body is falling apart.  This doesn’t happen overnight. 

The concept that the lump itself was the sole cause of the failure of health led to the California Cancer Commission selecting a cure.  The first cure that they pushed in the 1950s was Roentgen radiation, which meant X-raying a lump to death.  

The second cure was radioactive phosphorus, but they admit this treatment rarely destroys the lump.  

The third treatment was nitrogen mustard therapy, meaning mustard gas. Mustard gas is one of the most notorious chemical agents ever deployed on a battlefield. 

Although mustard gas killed lumps, chemicals do not have brains and therefore are not selective, so the chemical weapon attacked everything, causing nightmarish outcomes for patients, which included destruction of cells, bone marrow suppression, infertility, and an increased risk of cancer. 

So, aside from x-raying the lump to death, the safest option, science claimed, was cutting it out. But, as I already showed you, all the way back in 1860, people who were having their lumps painfully extracted and were upset because another lump soon appeared (because they didn’t change their lifestyle. They never removed the root cause, they only extracted a side effect of the root cause.) And science has known this for no less than 90 years!  90 flippin' years! Imagine having a job in which your company can be wrong for a century, but not only can you be wrong, you can chop people up and administer chemicals that cause serious damage or death. Now imagine if this job were funded by tax dollars. Imagine if not only did the public fund the unscientific science behind the cures that don’t cure anyone, but they also subsidized massive tax breaks so that these companies can keep their profits and not contribute to the system that allows them to exist.

Now imagine if those same companies produced poisons that caused lumps, financially incentivized doctors to diagnose cancer, and enlisted patients in costly treatments from which both Big Pharma and the doctor profit.  And imagine if all of this was one huge illusion because all the way back in the 1860s, they knew the true cause of the lumps could be traced to the “trail of the serpent.”  Imagine that….

NEXT READ:  Calling Out Famous Alternative Medicine Doctors [Cancer, The Final Chapter]

___________________________________________________

Did you see that I am headlining a big event on September 17th, 2026? Five of your favorite authors will be giving one-hour presentations.  Be sure to grab your ticket!  You can learn more about Truth Be Told: The Mega Event and each presentation here. Check out the commercial below!  BE SURE TO USE COUPON CODE "AGENT" TO GET $5 OFF!  You can't beat that deal!

If you’re a tech person, you can scan the QR code below to grab your ticket.  See you there!

Be sure to subscribe so my articles get sent to your email!

 Want to support my work?  Buy Me a Coffee or Make a Ko-Fi Donation:

Buy Me A Coffee

Make a Ko-Fi Donation

If you want to make sure you are updated when new articles, eBooks, events, and podcasts are released, be sure to sign up for WhatsApp notifications:

Get Notified on WhatsApp