The Never Before Told Story of CANCER [Part 1 By Agent131711]

NEXT READ: Part 2 - The Medical Journals

Welcome to the very interesting story of the rise of the cancer industry, from the 1850s to the 1950s, more specifically, how it played out in newspaper archives and how, all along, science has missed the obvious...    

To begin, we must define what we are calling cancer, which is a lump.  

The medical-science industry claims this lump is caused by genetic mutations and viruses like HPV and hepatitis as well as bacteria and parasites. 

My question for the medical-science fellows is, “Why exactly is a cancer bump a genetic mutation caused by a virus, yet a pimple or cyst is just bodily fluid buildup caused by blockages in the body’s natural drainage systems?”  

What about gout, which is also caused by a buildup of waste?

More interestingly, the industry now admits that viruses and mutations are not the only two causes of cancer.  They affirm that toxins (carcinogens) are also a leading cause.  They further admit excessive alcohol consumption, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, obesity, and air pollution. Well, isn’t that fascinating?  According to these wise folks in lab coats, we have three methods that all produce the same end result: a lump, and I absolutely agree with the lab coats on the latter.  It is my belief that all of these lumps, from, pimples to “cancer,” are our bodies’ way of getting rid of waste that cannot otherwise be disposed of for whatever reason. It is not a cause of sickness; it is a symptom of toxification. 

Now let’s dive into some untold history. 

An incredibly fascinating overlooked fact is that one of the first doctors to draw a parallel between the lump and an occupation was a British surgeon named Percivall Pott.  Back in 1775, Pott discovered that cancer of the scrotum was a common disease among chimney sweeps.  Why is this interesting?  Because inhaling soot, creosote, silica, organic vapors, aerosolized feces from bird and bat droppings—all of this is known to lead to a wide array of health problems.  Toxification.      

Skipping ahead to the 1850s, on the graph below, you will notice that a newspaper archive search for the keyword “cancer” produced 24,409 mentions in 1858, but by 1880 it jumped to nearly 56,000, and come 1890, that number doubled to 105,108 mentions.  

So something happened to popularize cancer between 1850 and 1890, but what?  Let’s see if we can figure it out.  

Back in 1850, cancer cures were already a big thing.  At this time, most diseases were considered to be due to bad blood, and the solution was said to be blood purification, which could be accomplished through assorted pills, powders, potions, and other treatments.  Of course, all of these cures came at a price, and none of them were cheap. 

In 1851, a first-of-its-kind free cancer hospital was opened in the UK.  The newspaper publication outlined that middle-aged people were the primary sufferers of this disease and that females outnumbered males. Here we must ask, what specifically was happening with these individuals who were not elderly and should have been in good physical health? 

In the 1860s, cutting out the lump was seen as the solution.  Soon, an alternative method was developed.  In this instance, the lump would be treated by pasting plaster onto it.  The plaster would have a circle a little larger than the size of the lump cut out of the center so that the cancer as well as a small ring of healthy skin next to it was exposed; meanwhile, the skin surrounding the lump was plastered over.  Then, a second special piece of plaster was applied to the top of the exposed lump.  This plaster was made of chloride of zinc (a highly corrosive and toxic inorganic salt), bloodroot, and wheat flour spread on a piece of muslin.  This hazardous chemical concoction would then sit on the lump for 24 hours.  When it was removed, one could see that the corrosive chloride of zinc burned the lump away, and the skin was white and parboiled, “as if scalded by hot steam.”  The wound would then be dressed as a burn wound.  According to the article, some time later, the cancer would come out of the body as a hard lump, and the wound would heal. 

Although this method worked to get the lump out, as did doctors best efforts to cut and burn, medical professionals were shocked to discover that the lumps kept regrowing, and nobody could figure out why.  

Because the lumps kept reappearing, come 1865, the public no longer wanted to undergo the painful knife surgeries, so the medicine men, not wanting to lose customers, offered both options: invasive treatments as well as noninvasive pills, powders, and potions. 

Although the medicine men were befuddled by the mystery lumps, not everyone in the general public was. In 1861, a book was published called What We Eat.  This book was about the grotesque adulteration of the American food supply (which we already know matched the UK food supply.)  Let me quote from it for you with some minor punctuation edits, 

__________________

[When consuming adulterated food] “… immediately serious and even fatal results occur, and we not uncommonly see accounts of the death of children, especially from the use of colored confectionary. How many attacks of “colic,” “vomiting,” “dysentery,” “sick headache,” how much “nervousness,” “blindness,” “deafness,” “dyspepsia,” or even paralysis and insanity might be traced by rigorous investigation to such sources? It is frightful to think of.”

“When we come to examine the list of adulterated /articles of food, we are surprised at its extent. Nothing seems to have escaped, which is not in its nature insusceptible of vitiation. Bread and butter, tea, coffee, cocoa, sugar, milk, spices, confectionary, preserved fruits and meats, vinegar, pickles, oils, wines, and liquors, almost every article that we find upon our tables—bear upon them the trail of the serpent, in the form of such delectable substances as salts of copper and arsenic, the chromate, oxide, acetate, and carbonate of lead, bi-sulphuret of mercury, gamboge, chromate of potash, Prussian blue, Brunswick green, catechu, alum, indigo, sulphuric acid, Venetian red, yellow ochre, bronze powders…”

“…Now with evidence such as the above, it is impossible to contend that the use of such a variety of injurious, and even poisonous, substances is unattended with danger and that adulteration does not affect the public health. It may so happen, and it doubtless does sometimes occur, that the same person, in the course of a single day, receives into his stomach some eight or ten of the articles above enumerated.” 

__________________

So, as you can see, all the way back in the 1860s, the public was being unknowingly loaded with toxins.  These toxins build up faster than the body could dispose of them, thus leading to the body creating a lump to quarantine the garbage.  This is why, even when that lump was cut out or burned off, if the individual did not change their lifestyle, it was inevitable that the lump would reappear.  And, should that person continue down the same path, it was only a matter of time before their system was so overloaded with poison that they would die. That death would then be blamed on the lump. [If you would like to learn more about the crazy food adulteration of the 1800s, read The Great Poisoning and the Virus Scapegoat ebook.] 

By 1867 the concept of burning out cancer lumps was in full swing. 

Because cancer was now blossoming into an industry, in the 1870s, new hospitals were being built.  One new hospital in Nebraska was four stories in height.  The same year, the Cancer Institute Office was established in Cincinnati, Ohio.  

Meanwhile, the noninvasive medical men were pushing cancer solvents.  Their newspaper ads featured one to three testimonials and nothing more. 

In 1880, a new noninvasive cure was found: vegetable compounds. 

Come 1887, a new discovery was made in Germany.  Here they claimed bacteria was indeed the cause of cancer.  

Much of the world agreed with this, so it became a fact.  Now that the cause was known, a cure could be found, and, 13 years after the bacteria discovery, that cure was discovered: X-ray radiation. 

Remember how, at the beginning of this publication, I showed you the news archives keyword search for cancer and how it boomed in the late 1880s and into the 1890s?  

I figured out what caused this.  Obituaries began listing cancer as the cause of death.  There are so many of these that it is making research difficult because actual articles are lost in a sea of cancer obituaries. 

By 1899, cancer was everywhere: on people’s feet, temples, noses, lips, cheeks, faces, and shoulders, and doctors could cure it all. 

Now here’s a very interesting article.  It comes to us from the St. Louis Globe Democrat in 1899.  The publication is called Bra’s Cancer Discoveries. It outlines how Doctor Bra was finding parasites in people who also had cancer lumps.  

Now, if you have researched parasites, these guys only show up when there is heavy toxification because they eat toxins.  So, Dr. Bra got permission to extract cultures of human cancer and then inoculate trees with them (maples, beeches, sycamores, elms). To his surprise, he discovered that, six months post-injection, the trees were dry rotting in spots. 

In 1903, a fellow researcher confirmed Bra’s research.  He too was finding parasites in cancer victims.  The medicine men concluded if they killed the parasites and cancer cells, the cancer would be stopped in its tracks, so a “destroying serum” was developed. 

The following year, the London Cancer Research Fund announced cancer is not caused by a parasite and begged doctors to stop using radium as a cure because it wasn’t actually curing anyone. I should mention, radium is a radioactive element that the body mistakes for calcium and deposits into bone tissue, causing chronic exposure to ionizing radiation.  Cancer lumps are one of the side effects of radium. 

No sooner than the Research Fund’s announcement, the Pasteur Institute and French Society of Surgery discovered that cancer was actually caused by a microbe.  They knew the solution would be to develop a vaccine. 

Simultaneously, other medicine fellows and scientists argued that cancer is, for sure, caused by parasites because they too found people with cancer loaded with parasites. 

Soon, because virus theory, germ theory, and the concept of an immune system were gaining steam, the idea of making people immune to cancer came to be.  The plan was to graft cancer onto mice, then grow it. That cancer would then be extracted, liquified, mixed with chemicals, and then injected into the public to make them immune to the lumps because, yeah, that makes sense. 

While the medical industry was going off the rails, a professor in Berlin found that people with cancer were also suffering from a loss of liver function. Remember, our liver flushes out toxins, so this makes so much sense that it kind of blows my mind.  It makes me wonder if all cancer patients also have limited use of a cleaning organ, hence the reason the body cannot dispose of the toxins and instead wads them up. 

Not long after, another fascinating point surfaced.  In this instance, Dr. Gould, a senior surgeon, found that people with cancer lumps also suffered from chronic inflammation of the tongue.  In fact, it was so common that people with mouth conditions would develop cancer that he deemed tongue inflammation a precursor to the disease. He also pointed out that the inflammation was not a direct cause of cancer. However, instead of investigating what people were consuming that was causing their mouths to be red, painful, swollen, and desensitized, the doctor emphasized the importance of keeping tissues intact. 

Meanwhile, radium was still going strong as a cure-all. 

Radium, they said, would remove all skin diseases, including birthmarks, and even cancer. 

So these people who already were so toxified that they had a tumor were now dosed with hazardous radium, which causes tumors. 

In 1909, the papers published that cancer was now common in fish, especially brook trout.  Instead of looking at if the water of the streams is causing the cancer in fish, they looked at if the fish are causing cancer in humans by spreading it through the water.  Do you also want to scream because you cannot believe that all of these people could miss the obvious? 

The same year that trout were found to be infected, Black people were found to be immune, so that was great news.  Again, nobody bothered examining the differences in lifestyles. The paper also reported that people in hard labor jobs were more likely to develop cancerous lumps.  

This too is interesting because people who work hard labor are the same people exposed to carcinogens daily.  These people are working with coal tar, harvesting crops sprayed with insecticides and herbicides, and other jobs with harsh chemicals, whereas people who hold a desk job have little exposure aside from their diet. 

Come 1910, a new cancer cure was found: the first cancer vaccination.  It was created by withdrawing fluid from the lumps of infected people who have to continually get their lumps drained.  This filth was then horrifyingly injected into the veins of other people with lumps who had not yet reached the stage of needing theirs drained. 

The following year, hot air treatments in combination with dietary changes were being used as a cure.

And also, in this same paper, someone tried to kill all the Jesuits by poisoning their wine.

In 1912, scientists at the Boston University School of Medicine claimed to have isolated the cancer-causing microbe and discovered a vaccine that will kill it.  These people sure do love injections.  

Soon, the medicine men were claiming to make guinea pigs and rabbits immune to cancer.  They would then withdraw “serum” and inject it into humans. 

While that was going on, in Paris, France, new methods of cancer diagnosis were being developed.  This new method consisted of frequently taking the temperature of a patient suspected of having cancer.  If this patient’s temp remained normal, they would be injected with a quote, “certain solution.”

After the injection, their temperature would continue to be taken every three hours.  Those with cancer would experience a one-degree temperature increase throughout the day.  Those who are healthy or are suffering from other diseases that are not cancer would experience no increase in temperature.  This process was not only being carried out in France, but also in Italy and Spain.  As expected, this bizarre new method led to an increase in cancer cases being found.  

By 1914, the medicine men were claiming that cancer could be cured with supplements, specifically potassium.  They claimed that all vegetables contained “vegetable salts” and those who were deprived of eating vegetables would not get enough vegetable salt.  This would eventually lead to the cancerous lump.  The solution, they said, was not to eat vegetables but instead to consume their product, potassium salt, which was the exact same thing.  Now people could replace clean eating with a bottle and not worry about cancer. 

In 1915, radium was becoming a mainstream cure.  It was now being used specifically for cancer.  Radioactive drinking water was becoming so popular that companies were now manufacturing devices that could be used. in private homes. 

Simultaneously, funds were being pumped into hospitals so that they could offer radium treatments. 

But, despite the alleged success of all of the aforementioned cures, the number of cancer victims kept growing every year.  In 1915, over 75,000 Americans were dying annually from the lumps. 

The Rockefeller Institute came to the rescue by discovering white lymph cells give immunity.  Rocky could now work on a vaccine. In the same paper announcing the discovery, we find some very interesting advertisements.  Located directly next to Rocky-boy’s article is an ad for “fat people,” which shows a very obese woman.  Next to that ad, we see Beecham’s Pills for sale.  

So we can affirmatively say, all the way back in 1915, in America there was not only a problem with obesity, but people had already been brainwashed into the idea that health comes in a pill.  

Not long after, magnesium pills were the new cancer cure.  Hundreds of papers pushed this hard.  Readers were directed to consume eight to ten grams of the chemical substance every day.  For reference, one teaspoon is five grams.  People were being told to chomp two teaspoons worth of factory-made powder daily. 

Should they do this, the advertisers claimed they would avoid cancer entirely.  

Next, it was found that both chickens and trees have cancer, and these cancers were caused by viruses.

In 1925, we find a rare gem, an article that outlines that cancer is not caused by microbes, bacteria, viruses, or germs.  It is instead caused by diet. In fact, all of the diseases that were currently plaguing society (rheumatism, tuberculosis, gastro-intestinal diseases, etc.) were all 100% caused by diet.  The article went on to say children, who are now diseased in record numbers, are the fault of their mothers for improperly feeding them. 

The article was about Sir William, a gentleman who had formed “The New Health Society” in England.  He was traveling the world in an effort to educate medical professionals, but, as you could have guessed, nobody wanted to hear it because there is no money in telling people to eat clean. 

While Sir William was trying to wake up the medicine men, the head of the department of medical research under the Medical Research Council determined X-rays expose viruses and cancer, so if we x-rayed the shit out of people, we could uncover all the bad guys lurking inside their bodies. 

The same year, a scientist attempted to sound the alarm by warning that these cancer cures in the paper are based on fraudulent data.  Cures were being determined based on a single patient. There was no scientific evidence backing the cures.  

While the scientist was sounding the alarm, radium was reported to cure 55% of all breast cancer cases if caught early enough.  This concept of early detection now became mainstream.  A new test was developed in 1926.  This test consisted of a few drops of blood being examined before any signs of a lump. If the blood was determined to be cancerous, the patient would immediately be sent to get an operation.  Post-operation, they would continue to do the blood test every six months.  

As the blood test was being rolled out, the Microbial Society discovered that raw vegetables cause cancer.  More specifically, Dr. Schumacher of the Society announced that armies of microbes hide inside of vegetable membranes. Therefore, if you eat the raw vegetables, you eat the cancer microbes, and boom, next thing you know, you have a lump.  The doctor pointed to tropical climates as proof.  He claimed that those living in them don’t really eat vegetables, and they don’t have a high incidence rate of cancer; therefore, the vegetables are to blame.  Trust the science.  

In 1926, the Sunday Dispatch published a fascinating article that stated scientists were baffled when they found that cancer was impacting people in “nests.”  Certain villages, even certain streets, were filled with cancer victims; meanwhile, the next village over, or even the next street, wouldn’t have a single case.  Again, instead of locating the differences between the two streets, such as a water source or chemicals used in gardens, the scientists assumed the street without cancer must have immunity, so they set about trying to figure out how these residents became immune to the disease.  It really makes you want to bang your head against a wall, doesn’t it?  

When animals within the cancerous areas were dissected, they were found to have parasites.  So what we have here are pockets of people and animals that are both being impacted by hazardous chemicals. 

In 1927, a health commissioner in the United States announced that cancer is not caused by germs. He also announced that it is not hereditary. 

The following year, scientists told The Madison News that the true cause of cancer was fermentation in the body.  When your body is essentially decomposing from the inside, tumor lumps will appear.  The solution, they said, was to eat a healthy diet with lots of vegetables.  

This article was followed by another of interest.  This one was called “A Wholesome Fear of Cancer Will Cause Hygienic Living.”  It explained that cancer doesn’t appear out of nowhere; there are always many signs leading up to it.  If you pay attention to your body and address the issues upon the first symptom, you do not have to fear getting cancer.  

They went on to point out that constant fear itself will cause health conditions.  If you spend your life worrying about ailments that you do not have, you will soon develop them.  

In 1929, it was discovered that chronic irritation to the skin, such as from tar and other chemical substances, causes cancer. Still nobody bothered to look at the chemical additives in the food supply. 

Not long after, the medical-science industry was pinning the disease on “virus infected cells.”

The cancer virus, they claimed, was, quote, “ultra microscopic”, but they were positive this was the cause of the lumps. 

Meanwhile, a doctor with a quite ironic name, Bloodgood, was following the new experimental cancer protocols, which consisted of injecting people with thorium and then x-raying the shit out of them. Dr. Bloodgood was then honored by the editorial board of the American Journal of Cancer at a dinner, and this new method was ready to be brought into clinics and hospitals across the nation.  

I should point out that internal exposure to thorium leads to increased risks of several cancers, including lung, pancreas, blood, and bone cancers.  This is because it is hazardous. 

Meanwhile, more supplements were being pushed on the public.  This time vitamins could be swallowed to address blood pressure, reverse signs of aging, and even cure cancer. Scientists claimed the mice trials successfully proved this. 

In 1939 something interesting happened.  The US government decided that tax-funded discoveries could be patented.  Now the American populace could pony up the cash for the medicine men to play with chemicals and create their so-called cures; then the medicine men could patent the cures and forever reap the benefits of them by selling the patented so-called cure back to the people who funded it in the first place.  Through this process, they could also block others from being able to use the so-called cure. 

What a windfall for the pharmaceutical industry! 

While that was going on, chemists in Germany discovered the true cause of cancer.  They claimed it was unnaturally twisted proteins inside the body.  Although that sounds kind of ridiculous, the German chemists made a point of interest. They said that in over 15% of ovarian cancer patients, they found unnatural levels of glutamic acid.  In breast cancer patients, it was almost 32%.

I say this is a point of interest because high glutamic acid (glutamate) levels are caused by dietary factors and nutrient deficiencies: poor eating. More specifically, a diet that consists primarily of ultra-processed foods.  Ultra-processed foods are industrial formulations made in labs.  These contain additives like emulsifiers, preservatives, and artificial flavors—stuff you would never find in a home kitchen or even in a grocery store. Examples include sugar-sweetened beverages, soda, energy drinks, and blended coffees, as well as packaged snacks like flavored potato chips, crackers, cookies, and white bread.  

So the Germans discovered that as much as a third of women suffering from breast cancer had sky-high levels of glutamic acid, which means these women were consuming these horrible foods as their diet!  One more note on glutamic acid: high levels are known to lead to anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, autism, OCD, epilepsy, and various neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s!  Folks, these conditions are all caused by chemicals in foods. No wonder the medicine men also own the ultra-processed food companies!

Once again, the findings would be ignored, and science would continue down the route of trying to find a cure—and this next article is another to pay close attention to.  In this publication called “New Cancer Discovery May Lead to Prevention Right From Cradle,” the lab coat men announced that cancer is indeed hereditary.  

They claimed this because mother mice with cancer were said to be passing it along to their babies.  Now think about this: A mother, whether she be mouse, human, horse, or whatever species, is consuming a diet filled with toxins. She is feeding her baby, so the baby is ingesting the identical toxins. Both develop lumps.  Science then claims this is due to genes, but the reality of the situation is so much more simple; if those same beings had instead consumed proper, clean nutrition, neither would have developed a symptom of the root cause. 

Now that the supplement train was full steam ahead, in 1940 the vitamin K shot was guaranteed to save thousands of infants from cancer. 

The article says the so-called vitamin was originally found in the fat of a dissected hogs liver.  Now it could be made in labs and jabbed into newborns.  

Additionally, a new cancer test came to be.  This one, like the prior, consisted of a drop of blood from a suspected cancer victim.  This blood would then be added to copper chloride.  If the person is infected with cancer, the blood would create a pattern that was different from the blood of uninfected people. The scientists claimed this test was 80 to 90% accurate.  

Even though there were now all of these tests and cures, and even though early detection was said to be the end-all to the disease, cancer cases were exploding.  Whether this rapid boom was from more testing or whether it was from more patients with lumps, I don’t know.  Likely a combination of both.  Regardless, more and more money needed to be raised so that the research and cures could continue.  Cancer drives and fundraisers began appearing in towns all across the nation. Citizens were encouraged to donate so the plague could be snuffed out. 

In the 1940s, protein supplements came to be, but not because people suddenly needed more protein.  Instead, it was because some men wanted to make money.  They wanted to find a product people would have to indefinitely repurchase, and protein powder was the winner.  This powder was made from toxic industrial-grade soy powder and hazardous chemicals.  To cover up the taste, they dumped in Hershey’s chocolate powder. This new supplement quickly became a huge hit.  Learn all about it in my eBook, The Protein Scam. 

In 1941, doctors in New York announced the findings of a study they had been performing on dogs.  They said fresh, whole foods contain something unknown that is protective, and poor diet is indeed the cause of cancer.  They then went on to peddle B vitamins and, of course, high proteins.

The next year, universities were engaged in cancer research, and Texas University claimed to have discovered a cancer virus.  They also developed a new method of growing cancer in chicken eggs. [To learn about this grotesque method, read Big Pharma Black Magic: Modern Medicine is Ancient Sorcery.]

In 1943 researchers were extracting fluid from cancer lumps and injecting it into other animals.  The injected animals would fall ill, and many would develop a cancer lump of their own.  Science said this proved there was a virus in the lump.  Further, the University of Texas was growing what they called a cancer virus in chicken eggs and then injecting the filth into animals.  Those animals would also become sick, and many would develop a lump.  They claimed this verified that a virus was indeed the cause of cancer. 

Now that we knew a virus was the cause, Big Pharma went to work finding chemical concoctions to kill it.  Come 1945, chemotherapy and many different drugs were being prescribed.  The paper admitted that neither actually cures cancer. 

In 1948, radioactive gold was being used to treat cancer.   This substance was being injected directly into the growth at Vanderbilt University.  It simply amazes me how much these people love injections.  

In 1949, the Institute for Cancer Research claimed fungi in every cancer tested.  This is also a point of interest because we know that fungi and mold come along to break down toxins and aid in decomposition, so if it is true that scientists were finding it in cancer victims, just like with the parasites, these organisms were present because there was a serious health problem. [Read The Black Mold Psyop.] 

By 1950, the medical-science industry, led by Johns Hopkins, was all-in on the concept of early detection and killing “young cancer cells” using drugs. This became the industry standard for care.  But, despite 100 years of cancer research, tests, and treatments, science was still no closer to finding the true cause. The University of California had just isolated what they called the potent poison from cancer tumors.  This substance, they said, when extracted from a cancer lump, is so deadly that even a small injection of it will kill a rat.  But despite discovering that cancer lumps are harboring a wad of poison, the medicine men still couldn’t figure out how that poison got there in the first place… 

NEXT READ:  The Shocking Medical Journals - Cancer Part 2

___________________________________________________

Did you see that I am headlining a big event on September 17th, 2026? Five of your favorite authors will be giving one-hour presentations.  Be sure to grab your ticket!  You can learn more about Truth Be Told: The Mega Event and each presentation here. Check out the commercial below!  BE SURE TO USE COUPON CODE "AGENT" TO GET $5 OFF!  You can't beat that deal!

 Want to support my work?  Buy Me a Coffee or Make a Ko-Fi Donation:

Buy Me A Coffee

Make a Ko-Fi Donation

If you want to make sure you are updated when new articles, eBooks, events, and podcasts are released, be sure to sign up for WhatsApp notifications:

Get Notified on WhatsApp