DEBUNKING Dr. Thorp, McCullough & Drew's New Ivermectin-Cancer Study [Part 3 Cancer: The Final Chapter by Agent131711]

Agent131711 Agent131711
August 24th, 2026 15 minute read

Listen to article

Audio generated by DropInBlog's Blog Voice AI™ may have slight pronunciation nuances. Learn more

In Part 1 of this series, we discussed the surprising history of cancer, 1850 to 1950. If you haven’t had a chance to read it, please do! It will really open your eyes to how this massive industry came to be and how all the way back in the 1860s people knew the real cause of illness.

In the second part of the series, we covered some incredible cancer information that I dug up by reading old medical journals. This information proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that a tumor (lump) is caused by pollution put into the body, whether that be through food, drink, medication, or injection. Surprisingly, it was the medicine men themselves who unintentionally proved this.

Now we are skipping to the current day, in which the medicine men still can’t find a cure because they refuse to acknowledge the obvious, but they nonetheless have an endless supply of chemical concoctions to sell us….

A reader brought two articles to my attention. They were interesting enough to write about. The first is by Nicolas Hulscher, who is the epidemiologist and administrator at the McCullough Foundation, as well as Dr. Drew Pinsky (famously known as “Dr. Drew”), Dr. James A. Thorp, Dr. Peter A. McCullough, and other individuals from The Wellness Company. This article is called BREAKING: Largest Human Cancer Study of Ivermectin + Mebendazole Is Now PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED in a Major Cancer Journal. (I agree that it's the longest title ever.)

To quote from the piece, “The largest real-world human study to date evaluating ivermectin and mebendazole in cancer patients is now peer-reviewed and published in Anticancer Research.”

They went on to claim that their study, which is actually called an even longer title, Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort, “represents one of the most compelling clinical signals ever documented for repurposed anti-parasitic therapies in oncology.” A summary of the study is as follows: “A diverse population of cancer patients was prescribed compounded ivermectin–mebendazole, with each capsule containing 25 mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole.” They claimed that, at approximately six months post-treatment initiation, they observed an 84.4% Clinical Benefit Ratio. “Nearly half of all patients reported the strongest positive outcomes, including no evidence of disease or tumor regression. An additional 36.1% reported disease stabilization, while only 15.6% reported progression.”

It also shows this colorful chart.

That makes you want to jump and place an order for these magic meds, right? Well, not so fast. TechArp.com published an article called “How an Ivermectin & Mebendazole Cancer Study Used Standard Treatments to Claim 84.4% Success.”

The publication points out, this study wasn’t actually a real study. For starters, it relied upon self-reporting to determine outcomes, exactly as the doctor’s graphic shows. TechArp wrote, “Patients were essentially asked to check boxes on their phones regarding how they thought their cancer was doing.”

“The study did not evaluate anonymous, unbiased cancer patients... Instead, the researchers actively recruited existing customers of The Wellness Company—the online telemedicine platform and pharmacy that all 12 authors are professionally associated with.” These were customers who had already signed up to purchase the Ivermectin-Metronidazole protocol.” This means these individuals felt they needed it and hoped, if not believed, it was the cure. This is extreme bias.

Did you read my eBook, Number Fuckery: How to Lie Legally? One of the examples I provide in that publication is the rigging of surveys by only polling segmented customers. What the Wellness Company did would be like Honda asking every customer at the Honda new car dealership what vehicle is the best make and then claiming that out of the 100 customers polled, everyone chose Honda, and so should you.

I should mention the Ivermectin study enrollment process was performed through email. And if you think it can't get any more ridiculous, just wait…

Next, there was no standardized control dosage. The Wellness Company prescribed the ivermectin-mebendazole pills, which they themselves manufactured, sold, and profited from. The patients were said to be “commonly” taking a pill or two a day, which implies that some patients were taking more or less. We know for a fact that many people believe if some is good, then lots is better, so it would not surprise me if some participants dosed even higher than three pills. But since there was no supervision, who really knows? Not to mention that we don’t even know if any of these people had an actual clinical diagnosis of cancer to begin with.

And if self-reporting from your own customers who are taking whatever dose they want without any oversight isn’t bad enough, over 38% of customers who enrolled in the study dropped out of the study! This means of the 197 who agreed to participate, 75 ghosted!

Now, I'm not a doctor, and you probably aren't either, but you and I can clearly see that this so-called study isn't scientific in any way. I’d argue that it shouldn't even be called a study in the first place. And you know as well as I do that Nicolas Hulscher, Dr. Drew, Dr. James A. Thorp, and Dr. Peter A. McCullough know the same. And if they don’t, they should be barred from practicing medicine. That said, what this is is highly deceptive. It speaks volumes to the character of these men and demonstrates perfectly that the alternative medicine industry is no different from pill-pushing Big Pharma. It's a glorified product advertisement disguised as a study for a medication that doesn't actually ‘cure’ a disease because the disease will forever be incurable because the medicine men refuse to examine the root cause and want to continue pretending it is some kind of mystery so that they can profit off this cash cow at the expense of the public.

I just wanted to use these two articles as examples to show you exactly how the wool is pulled over our eyes by these medical fellows, including those who claim to be in the “truth movement.” Now here’s where this article takes a turn.

TechArp then goes on to praise the medical-science industry and lure people away from Ivermectin, and back to Big Pharma to receive their horrific cancer “cures,” which makes sense when your website brags that your partners include Samsung, Western Digital, Acer, and other huge names.

There is no way to maintain a partnership of this magnitude and also call out Big Pharma for deploying the identical tricks as the Ivermectin study. Would you like an example of Pharma’s shenanigans? The same Big Pharma that TechArp wants you to put faith in…

In the Merck Gardasil vaccine clinical trials, Merck “spiked” the placebo with amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, as well as a neurotoxin (aluminum-containing adjuvants and other chemical mixtures). The result was that approximately equal numbers of subjects in the vaccine group and the placebo group suffered adverse reactions. Now instead of saying, “Whoa Nelly! Neurotoxic heavy metals cause as much damage as our drug! We should pull the plug on both, pronto!” They instead claimed the adverse reactions in both groups were similar, and that gave the impression that the Gardasil HPV vaccine was “as safe as a placebo” or as safe as what the public believes is always salt water.

Then, instead of reporting the large number of adverse reactions as side effects, Merck categorized these serious illnesses as “new medical conditions” unrelated to the Gardasil vaccine. Through this rigging of data, nearly half of study participants reported a “new medical condition.” These new conditions included high rates of neurological, musculoskeletal, and other conditions.

Additionally:

Many adverse reactions experienced by Gardasil clinical trial participants were never recorded.
In one trial, only 10% of participants received vaccination report cards. The purpose of these cards is so that investigators can obtain follow-up information from study participants about their adverse reactions.
Reports of serious events were not followed up.
Medical records were not reviewed.
To further bury the harm done, trial participants were told the vaccine was proven safe and the placebo was a saline solution. This made it less likely the injured would ever report adverse Gardasil side effects. After all, who is going to broadcast that they lost motion in their arm from saline solution?

The reality is, a clinical trial doesn’t have to prove the product in question is safe or effective. What they have to prove is the placebo is more deadly than not taking their new wonder drug. By showing more people die in the placebo “control group,” they automatically validate the product in question. When you look at it like that, it all makes sense.

If the goal is to make sure the placebo is more deadly, why use a sugar pill, olive oil, or saline solution? This is exactly why there are no FDA rules regarding placebos in clinical trials. Yes, you read that correctly. The placebo for the control group can be literally anything. It could be bleach if they wanted. And the best part for the manufacturers (who conduct their own trials) is that they don’t even need to share what the placebo is. This is why, in some cases, the placebo is literally the same product. In other cases, it’s a competitor drug. And, in almost all clinical trials, we have no idea what it is because it isn’t listed anywhere. That’s right, the University of California reviewed almost 170 placebo-controlled trials and discovered 92 percent never even described the ingredients of their placebo pills.

On top of that, it is the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) that evaluates the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. While it may sound wonderful that there is an entity designed to protect the public, back in 2000, an investigation into VRBPAC by the U.S. House of Representatives Reform Committee found, “The overwhelming majority of members, both voting members and consultants, have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.” The committee discovered that “in many cases, significant conflicts of interest are not deemed to be conflicts at all.”

But it gets worse. In the case of Gardasil and many other vaccines, the US Department of Health and Human Services shared directly in profits. The NIH also received royalties from sales of Gardasil, and the scientists whose names appear on the vaccine patents can receive up to $150,000 per year (in perpetuity). Meanwhile, the CDC, which at the time of the Gardasil release had an approximate budget of 11.5 billion dollars a year, was spending nearly half of its entire budget on the promotion and purchase of vaccines, from which it also profited.

But what about peer review? After all, the Thorp study was peer reviewed! Doesn't that mean it's legit?

Peer review involves a manuscript or research proposal being read and evaluated anonymously by scholars who are themselves part of the system. They may have considerable expertise in the period, subject matter, languages, and documents with which the author deals, but they have a list of criteria, and anyone looking to be a part of the system itself must agree to the criteria. For example, the “established fact” that a mystery lump is the cause of sickness, or the fact that chemotherapy is the solution for cancer. Should you question the legitimacy of chemotherapy, or, God forbid, question if what we have been told about cancer is accurate to begin with, then you will find yourself outside the circle of peer review trust.

With few exceptions, papers that are peer reviewed must act as an echo chamber. They must praise and validate the work of fellows from within the same system. Here, legitimate research that falls outside of the predefined “facts” is culled, destroyed, corrupted, blocked, or otherwise removed. Scholars and experts who buck the system will find themselves banned from it, and, quite likely, removed from their careers, shamed, and shunned. This is why you cannot find any papers in the massive NIH archive questioning the legitimacy of virology, let alone contagion.

It is within this peer review system that truth is suppressed. With this in mind, what we have left to work with is whatever we are allowed to have. And real researchers who want to advance their careers are forced to comply. This review system is funded by the system itself. And this mass censoring isn't only for the medical-science industry; it crosses over into history. With history, there is one story, and one narrative, and don't you dare attempt to publish content contrary to it. If facts don't fit, ignore them. It is because of this information blackout that people don't know the true story of the American Illuminati or the WWI History Heist. This history, although 100% true, is forbidden.

Now to bring this conversation back to where we started, with all of this in mind, is it any wonder that through ridiculously rigged trials, Ivermectin, an incredibly dangerous insecticide known to cause infertility and blindness, came to be yet another miracle cure? If you like shocking untold history and learning about medical data rigging combined with psychological operations, check out The Players Behind Ivermectin: How The World Became Convinced to Eat Insecticide.

So what they are doing is essentially trying to sell us the same poisons in different wrappers and calling them repurposed drugs, and cancer is often a target. Although the men in white jackets can't figure out how exactly those lumps get there, they have a plethora of expensive ways to annihilate them for sale.

___________________________________________________

Hey, thanks for reading! I have a huge announcement for you! Yesterday I released my second class! This SIX-WEEK-LONG class will be unlike any you have ever taken. This is not a conspiracy theory class; it is CONSPIRACY FACT. This class is designed for anyone who wants their mind blown with truth backed by evidence. No, this is not stuff you have already seen on social media--I wouldn’t waste my time or yours. It is my goal to teach you everything you’ve never seen. It is incredibly interesting, exciting, shocking, flabbergasting, and, at times, jaw-dropping. You don’t have to enjoy conspiracy deep dives to enjoy this class.

If you are a subscriber to any content creator on Shadowbanned Library or if you are a monthly donor, you get 75% off, bringing the class to only $99! Yes, $99 for 6 weeks. It's a crazy deal, but I really want everyone to be able to take it because this information is very important. I spent my entire summer making this class, and I know you'll love it.

Also, did you see that I am headlining a big event on September 17th, 2026? Five of your favorite authors will be giving one-hour presentations. Be sure to grab your ticket! You can learn more about Truth Be Told: The Mega Event and each presentation here.

THIS WEEK ONLY: When you buy a ticket to Truth Be Told, you can get Jamie Andrew’s MASSIVE book, The Failed Contagion Studies (1700-Present) FOR FREE. Yes, that’s a $10.99 eBook 100% free. To get it for free, buy your ticket to TBT then, after you place your order for the ticket, add the book to the cart, and it will be $0. Note that you have to purchase the ticket first because you get the reward AFTER you buy the ticket. The eBook is like a rebate, per se: buy the event and then get the book free. Those of you who already bought the ticket already have the reward; just add his book to cart and checkout.

Thank you so much for supporting us! We have huge news coming soon!

Be sure to subscribe so my articles get sent to your email!